Serveur d'exploration sur le peuplier

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Reconciling divergent interpretations of quaking aspen decline on the northern Colorado Front Range.

Identifieur interne : 003A85 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 003A84; suivant : 003A86

Reconciling divergent interpretations of quaking aspen decline on the northern Colorado Front Range.

Auteurs : Daniel M. Kashian [États-Unis] ; William H. Romme ; Claudia M. Regan

Source :

RBID : pubmed:17708209

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Ecologists have debated over the past 65 years whether quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) has or has not declined in abundance, vigor, or regeneration in western North America. Many studies have provided divergent interpretations of the condition of aspen forests, leading to difficulty in translating this ecological information into management recommendations. To reconcile these contrasting conclusions and to test the hypothesis that multiple types of aspen decline and persistence occur simultaneously on heterogeneous landscapes, we assessed 91 aspen stands across the northern Colorado Front Range to determine the range of ecological conditions that underlie aspen decline or persistence. Approximately 15% of aspen forest area in our sample exhibited dieback of mature stems coupled with a lack of young trees indicative of declining stands, most often at lower elevations where elk browsing is heavy and chronic, and where effects of fire exclusion have been most significant. However, 52% of the area sampled had multiple cohorts indicative of self-replacing or persistent stands. Conifer dominance was increasing in over 33% of all aspen forest area sampled, most often at high elevations among lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia Englem. ex Wats.) forests. Reconstructions of relative basal area and density of aspen and lodgepole pine in these stands suggest cyclical dominance of these species, where conifers gradually replace aspen over long fire intervals, and aspen vigorously re-establish following stand-replacing fires. The diversity of ecological contexts across the northern Colorado Front Range creates a variety of aspen dynamics leading to decline or persistence, and no single trend describes the general condition of aspen forests in appropriate detail for managers. Active management may be useful in preserving individual stands at fine scales, but management prescriptions should reflect specific drivers of decline in these stands.

DOI: 10.1890/06-1431.1
PubMed: 17708209


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Reconciling divergent interpretations of quaking aspen decline on the northern Colorado Front Range.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kashian, Daniel M" sort="Kashian, Daniel M" uniqKey="Kashian D" first="Daniel M" last="Kashian">Daniel M. Kashian</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Forest, Rangeland, and Watershed Stewardship, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA. dkash@wayne.edu</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Forest, Rangeland, and Watershed Stewardship, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Colorado 80523</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Romme, William H" sort="Romme, William H" uniqKey="Romme W" first="William H" last="Romme">William H. Romme</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Regan, Claudia M" sort="Regan, Claudia M" uniqKey="Regan C" first="Claudia M" last="Regan">Claudia M. Regan</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2007">2007</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:17708209</idno>
<idno type="pmid">17708209</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1890/06-1431.1</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">003A92</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003A92</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">003A92</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">003A92</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">003A92</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">Reconciling divergent interpretations of quaking aspen decline on the northern Colorado Front Range.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kashian, Daniel M" sort="Kashian, Daniel M" uniqKey="Kashian D" first="Daniel M" last="Kashian">Daniel M. Kashian</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Forest, Rangeland, and Watershed Stewardship, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA. dkash@wayne.edu</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Forest, Rangeland, and Watershed Stewardship, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Colorado 80523</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Romme, William H" sort="Romme, William H" uniqKey="Romme W" first="William H" last="Romme">William H. Romme</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Regan, Claudia M" sort="Regan, Claudia M" uniqKey="Regan C" first="Claudia M" last="Regan">Claudia M. Regan</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1051-0761</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2007" type="published">2007</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Colorado (MeSH)</term>
<term>Conservation of Natural Resources (methods)</term>
<term>Conservation of Natural Resources (trends)</term>
<term>Ecology (MeSH)</term>
<term>Fires (prevention & control)</term>
<term>Population Dynamics (MeSH)</term>
<term>Populus (growth & development)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Colorado (MeSH)</term>
<term>Conservation des ressources naturelles (méthodes)</term>
<term>Conservation des ressources naturelles (tendances)</term>
<term>Dynamique des populations (MeSH)</term>
<term>Incendies (prévention et contrôle)</term>
<term>Populus (croissance et développement)</term>
<term>Écologie (MeSH)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en">
<term>Colorado</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="croissance et développement" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Populus</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="growth & development" xml:lang="en">
<term>Populus</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en">
<term>Conservation of Natural Resources</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="méthodes" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Conservation des ressources naturelles</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="prevention & control" xml:lang="en">
<term>Fires</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="prévention et contrôle" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Incendies</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="tendances" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Conservation des ressources naturelles</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="trends" xml:lang="en">
<term>Conservation of Natural Resources</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en">
<term>Ecology</term>
<term>Population Dynamics</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Colorado</term>
<term>Dynamique des populations</term>
<term>Écologie</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Ecologists have debated over the past 65 years whether quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) has or has not declined in abundance, vigor, or regeneration in western North America. Many studies have provided divergent interpretations of the condition of aspen forests, leading to difficulty in translating this ecological information into management recommendations. To reconcile these contrasting conclusions and to test the hypothesis that multiple types of aspen decline and persistence occur simultaneously on heterogeneous landscapes, we assessed 91 aspen stands across the northern Colorado Front Range to determine the range of ecological conditions that underlie aspen decline or persistence. Approximately 15% of aspen forest area in our sample exhibited dieback of mature stems coupled with a lack of young trees indicative of declining stands, most often at lower elevations where elk browsing is heavy and chronic, and where effects of fire exclusion have been most significant. However, 52% of the area sampled had multiple cohorts indicative of self-replacing or persistent stands. Conifer dominance was increasing in over 33% of all aspen forest area sampled, most often at high elevations among lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia Englem. ex Wats.) forests. Reconstructions of relative basal area and density of aspen and lodgepole pine in these stands suggest cyclical dominance of these species, where conifers gradually replace aspen over long fire intervals, and aspen vigorously re-establish following stand-replacing fires. The diversity of ecological contexts across the northern Colorado Front Range creates a variety of aspen dynamics leading to decline or persistence, and no single trend describes the general condition of aspen forests in appropriate detail for managers. Active management may be useful in preserving individual stands at fine scales, but management prescriptions should reflect specific drivers of decline in these stands.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed>
<MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM">
<PMID Version="1">17708209</PMID>
<DateCompleted>
<Year>2007</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>03</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised>
<Year>2019</Year>
<Month>09</Month>
<Day>17</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print">
<Journal>
<ISSN IssnType="Print">1051-0761</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print">
<Volume>17</Volume>
<Issue>5</Issue>
<PubDate>
<Year>2007</Year>
<Month>Jul</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Ecol Appl</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Reconciling divergent interpretations of quaking aspen decline on the northern Colorado Front Range.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination>
<MedlinePgn>1296-311</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<Abstract>
<AbstractText>Ecologists have debated over the past 65 years whether quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) has or has not declined in abundance, vigor, or regeneration in western North America. Many studies have provided divergent interpretations of the condition of aspen forests, leading to difficulty in translating this ecological information into management recommendations. To reconcile these contrasting conclusions and to test the hypothesis that multiple types of aspen decline and persistence occur simultaneously on heterogeneous landscapes, we assessed 91 aspen stands across the northern Colorado Front Range to determine the range of ecological conditions that underlie aspen decline or persistence. Approximately 15% of aspen forest area in our sample exhibited dieback of mature stems coupled with a lack of young trees indicative of declining stands, most often at lower elevations where elk browsing is heavy and chronic, and where effects of fire exclusion have been most significant. However, 52% of the area sampled had multiple cohorts indicative of self-replacing or persistent stands. Conifer dominance was increasing in over 33% of all aspen forest area sampled, most often at high elevations among lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia Englem. ex Wats.) forests. Reconstructions of relative basal area and density of aspen and lodgepole pine in these stands suggest cyclical dominance of these species, where conifers gradually replace aspen over long fire intervals, and aspen vigorously re-establish following stand-replacing fires. The diversity of ecological contexts across the northern Colorado Front Range creates a variety of aspen dynamics leading to decline or persistence, and no single trend describes the general condition of aspen forests in appropriate detail for managers. Active management may be useful in preserving individual stands at fine scales, but management prescriptions should reflect specific drivers of decline in these stands.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y">
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Kashian</LastName>
<ForeName>Daniel M</ForeName>
<Initials>DM</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Department of Forest, Rangeland, and Watershed Stewardship, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA. dkash@wayne.edu</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Romme</LastName>
<ForeName>William H</ForeName>
<Initials>WH</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Regan</LastName>
<ForeName>Claudia M</ForeName>
<Initials>CM</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013486">Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo>
<Country>United States</Country>
<MedlineTA>Ecol Appl</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>9889808</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>1051-0761</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D003120" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Colorado</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D003247" MajorTopicYN="N">Conservation of Natural Resources</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000639" MajorTopicYN="N">trends</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D004463" MajorTopicYN="Y">Ecology</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D005390" MajorTopicYN="N">Fires</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000517" MajorTopicYN="Y">prevention & control</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D011157" MajorTopicYN="N">Population Dynamics</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D032107" MajorTopicYN="N">Populus</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000254" MajorTopicYN="Y">growth & development</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData>
<History>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed">
<Year>2007</Year>
<Month>8</Month>
<Day>22</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline">
<Year>2007</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>4</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez">
<Year>2007</Year>
<Month>8</Month>
<Day>22</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17708209</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1890/06-1431.1</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>États-Unis</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree>
<noCountry>
<name sortKey="Regan, Claudia M" sort="Regan, Claudia M" uniqKey="Regan C" first="Claudia M" last="Regan">Claudia M. Regan</name>
<name sortKey="Romme, William H" sort="Romme, William H" uniqKey="Romme W" first="William H" last="Romme">William H. Romme</name>
</noCountry>
<country name="États-Unis">
<noRegion>
<name sortKey="Kashian, Daniel M" sort="Kashian, Daniel M" uniqKey="Kashian D" first="Daniel M" last="Kashian">Daniel M. Kashian</name>
</noRegion>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/PoplarV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003A85 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 003A85 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Bois
   |area=    PoplarV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:17708209
   |texte=   Reconciling divergent interpretations of quaking aspen decline on the northern Colorado Front Range.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:17708209" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PoplarV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37.
Data generation: Wed Nov 18 12:07:19 2020. Site generation: Wed Nov 18 12:16:31 2020